
Reviews
Part of Check affiliate marketing reviews before you commit budget
When to run an affiliate marketing selection checklist for England
An affiliate marketing selection checklist for England teams, covering advertising rules, business regulation and commerce media due diligence before signing.
What to take away
- The checklist earns its keep when you are choosing between two or three platforms, not when you already have a favourite.
- Advertising rules bite at selection stage, so check disclosure and claims handling before contracts are signed.
- Regulation and data duties should be scored as pass or fail, not as a tie-breaker.
- Commerce media benchmarks help you judge whether a platform's reporting matches how retail media is bought.
- Score every criterion out of five, then write down why the top two differ.
Start with the rules that can stop a deal
Selection is a risk exercise before it is a features exercise. Two platforms can look identical on commission logic and carry very different legal exposure.
Begin with disclosure. The ASA advice for businesses sets out how affiliate promotions must be identifiable as advertising, and that applies to the creative your partners publish, not just your own site. If a platform cannot enforce disclosure, that is a fail.
Next, check the wider regulation picture. The Business regulation overview on GOV.UK lists the rules touching trading, consumer protection and record keeping. A platform hosting tracking links and payout data sits inside that picture.
Score each item below as pass, partial or fail before you move to commercial terms.
The affiliate marketing selection checklist
- Disclosure enforcement: can the platform show you the workflow that flags non-compliant creative?
- Tracking integrity: what happens to unattributed sales, and who audits the match rate?
- Data handling: where is publisher and customer data stored, and what is the retention rule?
- Reporting: can you export cost per acquisition by publisher without a manual rebuild?
- Contract exit: what notice period applies, and who owns historical tracking data?
- Support model: is there a named contact in your timezone during campaign peaks?
- Integration: does it connect to your existing ecommerce stack without custom work?
- Pricing transparency: are network fees, override fees and minimum spend shown in writing?
For a fuller view of how these score against each other, the comparison framework in affiliate marketing reviews and comparison methods for 2027 is worth reading before you shortlist.
Judge reporting against commerce media norms
Affiliate reporting has converged with retail media buying, and buyers now expect the same transparency from both. The IAB Commerce Centre of Excellence publishes resources on commerce media standards that give you a fair benchmark for what good reporting looks like.
Use that benchmark in the checklist. If a platform cannot break down performance by publisher, placement and creative type, it is behind the market, and that gap becomes a budget argument you cannot win.
For English teams, the practical test is simple: ask for one month of sample reporting from a comparable advertiser, anonymised if needed. Read the columns, not the summary slide.
Score the shortlist, then sanity-check the market
Give each platform a score out of five for every checklist line, then weight the lines that matter to your channel mix. A programme with heavy content publisher spend should weight disclosure enforcement higher than a voucher-led programme would.
Once the scores are in, check them against the wider market. A shortlist built from memory is rarely the strongest, and affiliate marketing best providers in England shows whether you have missed a credible option.
Keep the scoring sheet: it becomes your defence when someone asks why the cheaper platform was rejected.
Common questions
How many platforms should the checklist cover?
Three to five is workable. Fewer than three and you are not really comparing; more than five and the scoring becomes shallow. Include at least one option you have not used before.
Should legal review happen before or after scoring?
Score first, then send the top two to legal. Scoring filters out platforms that cannot meet basic disclosure and data requirements, which saves legal time on options that were never viable.
How often should the checklist be refreshed?
Review it annually, and again whenever advertising guidance or data rules change. Stale criteria quietly bias your next decision.
What if two platforms score the same?
Go back to the weighted lines and check your assumptions. A tie usually means a criterion is doing no work, or that you have not tested reporting quality with real sample data.



